Instead, AMD stopped at the $250 3600XT, leaving the 3600 stranded in the $160 to $200 price class. The XT series also didn't include a refreshed Rymodel. It even holds its own in threaded work, too.ĪMD refreshed the Ryzen 3000 lineup with the XT series last year, but those chips didn't deliver enough performance uplift (typically in the two to three percent range) to justify the higher price tag. This chip comes with six cores, twelve threads, and Intel's new Cypress Cove architecture that brings about tremendous performance improvements in single-threaded and gaming performance. In contrast, Intel's Core i5-11400 comes with an ultra-competitive $157 to $182 price point and is available at most major retailers near its suggested price point. It's also simply getting long in the tooth. This processor has served as the go-to recommendation for budget rigs for several years, largely on the strength of its wonderful blend of performance and pricing, but due to ongoing chip shortages, finding the Ryanywhere near its normal pricing of $199 is a rarity. Surprisingly, the Rocket Lake Core i5 squares off with the venerable Ryzen 5 3600, AMD's two-year-old silicon that comes armed with six cores and twelve threads powered by the last-gen Zen 2 architecture. That's left Intel plenty of room to strike in the budget gaming arena with its Rocket Lake Core i5-11400. But AMD's ascension to the top of the desktop PC market has found it focusing on high-end premium chips while it sticks with its older, Zen 2 chips for its lower-range lineup that caters to the majority of gamers (the $299 Ryzen 5 5600X is the bottom of the Zen 3 stack). AMD's Ryzen 5000 processors took the lead in the desktop PC from Intel's competing Comet Lake processors last year, upsetting our Best CPU for gaming recommendations and our CPU Benchmarks hierarchy. The Core i5-11600KF still manages to take a sizable lead over the 11400F, showing that these benchmarks are more affected by the single-core performance rather than multi-threaded grunt.The Intel Core i5-11400 vs AMD Ryrivalry is a heated battle for budget gaming rig supremacy in the increasingly competitive desktop PC market. The single-threaded test sees the Core i5-11600KF claim its maiden victory.įinally, we have the 3DMark scores which are more indicative of the graphics card performance than the CPU. The Core i5-11400F which has the same TDP as the 5600X scores just 10,132 and 1,401 points in the multi and single-threaded benchmarks, respectively.ĬPU-Z sees the Ryzen 5 5600X take a rather substantial lead over both the Core i5-11400F and the Core i5-11600KF in the multi-threaded bench, being more than a thousand points faster than the former and nearly 800 points faster than the latter. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 5 5600X is a hundred points ahead of the stock 11600KF in the multi-threaded test and 74 points faster in the single-core benchmark. The Core i5-11400F, although offers similar performance in the single-threaded test, it falls behind by a notable margin in multi-threaded workloads. The deltas shrink to just 5% in Cinebench R20 for the multi-core benchmark and just a couple of percent for the single-core test. In Cinebench R15, the Ryzen 5 5600X is a significant 15% faster than the 11600K in the multi-core benchmark and a modest 6-7% faster in the single-threaded test.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |